
(WASHINGTON, D.C.) — The U.S. Supreme Court will begin the New Year by considering whether to hear arguments in several lawsuits …
(WASHINGTON, D.C.) — In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Janus v. AFSCME that — like …
Kirsti Parde, a court reporter for the LA Superior Court and a former member of SEIU 721, which represents Southern California public service workers.
Not only does the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) believe it’s OK to forge an employee’s signature on a membership form so it could continue collecting dues despite her stated desire to leave, but now it’s insisting the victim be punished for complaining about it.
In the wake of a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling affirming that government employees can no longer be forced to …
Ten days into the month of August and the Freedom Foundation’s Oregon office has already filed another forgery lawsuit against …
On Tuesday, a Marion County public employee filed the latest in a growing number of lawsuits accusing government employee labor unions of forging signatures on membership documents in order to continue deducting dues against the worker’s wishes.
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court in Janus v. AFSCME banned forced union funding by public employees, labor leaders claim nothing much has changed for them and they are doing just fine.
To one extent or another, probably every public-sector union aggressively violates the First Amendment rights of the government employees it claims to represent. But for sheer insolence, Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is the heavyweight champion.
For most of his 10 years as an Oregon state employee, Christopher Zielinski paid his union dues without a beef and had no reason to question the quality of representation he was getting from SEIU 503.