Close
X
Freedom Foundation

Get in touch

Freedom Foundation
Opt Out Today
  • Blogs
  • Staff
  • Donate
  • Join Us
  • Profiting from a Pandemic
  • Why We Fight
  • Cigars
  • SCOTUS Appeals
Freedom Foundation
Opt Out Today
Freedom Foundation

Contact Info

The myth of the bipartisan union

Labor Washington
  • Maxford Nelsen
  • January 3, 2023

A conservative public-school employee in Washington recently contacted the Freedom Foundation to ask about the nature of her union’s political giving. Government unions have a well-deserved reputation for heavily supporting far-left political candidates and issues, but this employee had heard that her union was more bipartisan in its political giving, contributing to both Democrat and Republican candidates alike.

Indeed, the union in question — Public School Employees of Washington/SEIU Local 1948 (PSE) — has a reputation in Olympia for being more politically balanced than other government unions and, at first glance, that appears plausible.

According to the Freedom Foundation’s analysis of campaign finance records filed with the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, PSE contributed a total of $66,500 to 55 Democrat candidates for office in 2022 and $40,500 to 32 Republicans. It also contributed $2,000 to an independent candidate for state senate and $500 to a candidate running for a nonpartisan office.

Viewed in isolation, PSE’s direct giving to candidates indicates a clear party preference but does not suggest extreme partisanship.

Unfortunately, the perception falls apart under scrutiny. Here’s why.

Washington law limits the amount of money that any person, business, union, etc., can contribute directly to a candidate. The current maximum is $2,000 in state legislative races. Consequently, it is common for most large political players—whether liberal or conservative—to contribute relatively small sums to candidates from both parties. This makes the contributor appear balanced or neutral and helps ensure it has access to lawmakers no matter which party is in power.

One way to determine an interest group’s political preferences is by analyzing which side it picks in competitive elections. In PSE’s case, the union generally contributed to Republican candidates in safe legislative districts but avoided contributing to Republicans in swing districts.

Further, because the amount of money that can be given directly to candidates is sharply limited, most campaign spending takes the form of “independent expenditures.” These are political advertisements supporting or opposing candidates for office that are commissioned and paid for by a union, corporation, or other entity without coordination with the candidates. Most often, interest groups pool their funds in a political committee, or PAC, which actually pays for the independent expenditures.

Unsurprisingly, the $109,500 PSE contributed directly to candidates in 2022 was dwarfed by the $309,280 it contributed to PACs, generally to engage in independent expenditures. Of this, $77,000 went to PACs affiliated with Democrats and $22,500 went to GOP-controlled PACs. The remaining $209,780 went to two PACs operated by the SEIU Washington State Council and which back Democrat candidates and liberal ballot measures in all but the rarest circumstances.

All told, PSE contributed $418,780 to candidates and PACs in 2022. Of this, $353,280 (84%) went to Democrat candidates or affiliated/aligned PACs. Only $63,000 (15%) supported Republican candidates and PACs.  

In short, the most “bipartisan” government union in Washington maintains its reputation by making small-dollar contributions directly to secure GOP candidates while funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democrats behind the scenes via PAC contributions to ensure Republicans remain a permanent legislative minority.

While the union can’t be faulted for its cunning or political acumen, it stands to lose membership and clout as more of its members learn the truth about the reality of its extreme partisanship.

  • PDC PSE Public Disclosure Commission SEIU 1948

Recent Blogs

Union Politics, Dollars Upended the Ohio State House
January 26, 2023
Freedom Foundation Reaction to Washington State Supreme Court Hearing on Capital Gains Tax
January 26, 2023
Freedom Foundation calls out federal schemes to expose more workers to union pressure
January 20, 2023
NJ public employees refuse to take no for an answer
January 20, 2023
Unionize management? Washington state is considering it.
January 17, 2023

Press Articles

  • Jul 06 — RedState — Janus at 4: Landmark Labor Ruling Helped but Still Needs to be Enforced More Aggressively

    Read The Article

  • Jun 28 — Ineptocracy Chronicles — Teacher Unions Fund Left Wing Politics

    Read The Article

  • Jun 25 — The Hill — States Should Protect Caregivers' Medicaid Funds from Union Skims

    Read The Article

  • Jun 15 — Legal Newsline — Freedom Foundation: 'Education Union Spent More Money on Political Activities than Worker Representation'

    Read The Article

  • Jun 09 — Southern California Record — LA Superior Court Court Reporter Accuses Union of Forging Her Signature on Membership Card

    Read The Article

  • General Inquiries

    Info@FreedomFoundation.com

    Media Inquiries

    avarner@freedomfoundation.com

    Follow Us

             

    Contact Locations

    Washington:

    360-956-3482
    P.O. Box 552 Olympia,
    WA 98507

    Pennsylvania:

    484-747-6072
    P.O. Box 1069 Kennett Square,
    PA 19348

    California:

    949-954-8914
    1442 E Lincoln Ave #440 Orange,
    CA 92865

    Oregon:

    503-951-6208
    P.O. Box 18146 Salem,
    OR 97305

    Ohio:

    380-207-3901
    P.O. Box 14210 Cincinnati,
    OH 45250

    © 2021 Freedom Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
    Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 94-3136961