Close
X
Freedom Foundation

Get in touch

Freedom Foundation
Opt Out Today
  • Blogs
  • Staff
  • Donate
  • Join Us
  • Profiting from a Pandemic
  • Why We Fight
  • Cigars
  • SCOTUS Appeals
Freedom Foundation
Opt Out Today
Freedom Foundation

Contact Info

Appeals Court hears Freedom Foundation public disclosure cases one after another

Litigation Washington
  • Jeff Rhodes
  • February 1, 2022

Freedom Foundation attorney Sydney Phillips got to make back-to-back arguments on Jan. 14 to the Washington State Division 1 Court of Appeals in a pair of separate but similar lawsuits, each concerning the organization’s ability to fully access the contact information of state, county and local employees.

In both cases, lawyers for the state and the labor unions representing its employees tried to portray the standoff as a threat to the workers’ privacy when, in fact, their real concern is keeping the Freedom Foundation from informing them about their recently affirmed Constitutional right to decline union membership and dues deductions.

The first case, Washington Education Association (WEA), et al, v. Department of Retirement Systems, et al, concerns a 2020 information request by the Freedom Foundation to obtain the full names and birthdates of public employees working for the state Department of Retirement Services and the Office of Financial Management.

Nearly a month later, on March 26, 2020, a group of three unions filed a complaint to block release of that information. In April 2020, a Thurston County Superior Court judge granted the union’s request, ruling that a bill passed by the Washington State Legislature exempted the information sought by the Freedom Foundation from public information requests.

During the Appeals Court hearing on Jan. 14, Phillips argued the Freedom Foundation was entitled to the information in part because it is, by legal standards, a news organization and media requests are an exception to the new law.

The state’s lawyers responded that the Freedom Foundation never raised the “news organization” exception in its earlier pleadings.

The second case, Washington Federation of State Employees (WPEA), et al. v. Freedom Foundation, et al, dates back to a 2019 information request by the Freedom Foundation to “various state and local government agencies requesting disclosure of union represented employees’ full names, birthdates, and work email addresses” among other records.

The agencies reviewed the information requests, determined that all the requested records were disclosable and indicated that, absent a court order, they intended to release the requested records including the employees’ full names associated with their corresponding birthdates and the employees’ work email addresses.

Again, the unions filed motions to prevent the disclosure of the requested records. A Superior Court judge granted the unions’ motions for preliminary injunctions to prevent the agencies from disclosing most of the requested information. Ultimately, the unions were granted a permanent injunction preventing the release of over a thousand public records.

During the Jan. 14 hearing, the unions’ lawyer argued that considering a government employee’s name and birthdate public information exposed workers to, for example, risk of harassment from estranged spouses, and much of the discussion concerned ways to make the information available while still protecting their privacy.

“The whole argument is nothing but a diversion because the unions couldn’t care less about the workers’ privacy,” Phillips said. “This is information the Freedom Foundation uses to inform public workers of their constitutional rights. There is no risk of harm from lawfully disclosed records.”

Phillips said the unions and their allies in the Washington Attorney General’s Office are concerned with one thing only — making sure workers only hear one side of the story.

The unions’ side.

  • Court of Appeals Sydney Phillips WEA

Recent Blogs

Union Politics, Dollars Upended the Ohio State House
January 26, 2023
Freedom Foundation Reaction to Washington State Supreme Court Hearing on Capital Gains Tax
January 26, 2023
Freedom Foundation calls out federal schemes to expose more workers to union pressure
January 20, 2023
NJ public employees refuse to take no for an answer
January 20, 2023
Unionize management? Washington state is considering it.
January 17, 2023

Press Articles

  • Jul 06 — RedState — Janus at 4: Landmark Labor Ruling Helped but Still Needs to be Enforced More Aggressively

    Read The Article

  • Jun 28 — Ineptocracy Chronicles — Teacher Unions Fund Left Wing Politics

    Read The Article

  • Jun 25 — The Hill — States Should Protect Caregivers' Medicaid Funds from Union Skims

    Read The Article

  • Jun 15 — Legal Newsline — Freedom Foundation: 'Education Union Spent More Money on Political Activities than Worker Representation'

    Read The Article

  • Jun 09 — Southern California Record — LA Superior Court Court Reporter Accuses Union of Forging Her Signature on Membership Card

    Read The Article

  • General Inquiries

    Info@FreedomFoundation.com

    Media Inquiries

    avarner@freedomfoundation.com

    Follow Us

             

    Contact Locations

    Washington:

    360-956-3482
    P.O. Box 552 Olympia,
    WA 98507

    Pennsylvania:

    484-747-6072
    P.O. Box 1069 Kennett Square,
    PA 19348

    California:

    949-954-8914
    1442 E Lincoln Ave #440 Orange,
    CA 92865

    Oregon:

    503-951-6208
    P.O. Box 18146 Salem,
    OR 97305

    Ohio:

    380-207-3901
    P.O. Box 14210 Cincinnati,
    OH 45250

    © 2021 Freedom Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
    Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 94-3136961