Unions’ disingenuous membership claims don’t tell the real story

Unions’ disingenuous membership claims don’t tell the real story

Unions’ disingenuous membership claims don’t tell the real story

Oregon’s public-sector union leaders would have you believe the U.S. Supreme Court’s upcoming ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, generally expected to end the practice of forcing government employees to pay union fees against their will, will have only a “temporary” effect on their membership ranks and revenue. 

That was the thesis of a recent article in the Portland Tribune entitled, “Despite legal threat, union memberships rise.” 

As with nearly everything Big Labor says about Janus, however, the claim is misleading at best and an outright lie at worst. 

The article primarily focuses on Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 503’s experience following a similar 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case called Harris v. Quinn. “(I)f a similar court ruling in 2014 is any indication, any lost revenue from the change in interpretation of the law could be only temporary,” the writer, Paris Achen, confidently states. 

Yet Achen’s supporting “facts” are so inapplicable to reality that you have to wonder whether she even attempted to verify them. 

For starters, citing U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicating  union membership in Oregon “increased from (a historic low of) 13.5 percent in 2016 to 14.9 percent in 2017” is virtually worthless insofar as Janus or Harris is concerned. 

Why? Because the Bureau’s data includes the total number of wage and salary workers in Oregon at that time – around 1.7 million – whereas the Janus and Harris cases affect only public employees, who accounted for less than 260,000 – a mere 15 percent – of those 1.7 million.  

In other words, the fact that overall union membership went up in Oregon in 2017 does not necessarily mean that public-sector union membership increased. 

Even worse, however, is the article’s muddle-headed connection between SEIU 503’s own assertions about its membership ranks and the Harris decision. 

In suggesting that Harris didn’t have a lasting effect, Achen states that SEIU 503 “saw its dues-paying memberships drop by 5,000 the year of the ruling … By 2015, however, the numbers had rebounded, and by 2017, membership exceeded 58,000.” 

These numbers appear to come straight from the LM-2 reports that SEIU 503 must file with the U.S. Department of Labor. 

But the 58,000 figure cited doesn’t apply specifically to the Harris population; rather, it includes the entirety of workers represented by SEIU 503. It’s the same mistake Achen made when citing the aforementioned U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics report. 

And because public employees in Oregon currently have no choice but to be represented and pay union fees, the number naturally rises every time the government hires a new employee – which it does with alarming frequency. 

State payroll data give a much clearer indication of the truth. In fact, data obtained by the Freedom Foundation in 2017 indicate that, as of August of last year, 40 percent of Harris-affected caregivers were no longer dues-paying members of SEIU 503.   

Thus, if Achen or SEIU 503 truly believe that Harris is “any indication” of what to expect from Janus, they might be in for a big surprise. 

Policy Analyst
Ben Straka serves as a policy analyst for the Freedom Foundation. His responsibilities include an array of policy research and reform efforts, primarily centered around labor relations, education and government transparency within the states. In addition, he provides support for the Freedom Foundation’s Outreach program and works closely with the rest of the team to hold local governments and public-sector unions accountable to state residents. Ben joined the Freedom Foundation in May 2016. He is a native of Eugene, Ore., and a graduate of Corban University, where he studied political science and business.