Close
X
Freedom Foundation

Get in touch

Freedom Foundation
Opt Out Today
  • Blogs
  • Staff
  • Donate
  • Join Us
  • Profiting from a Pandemic
  • Join Our Team
  • Why We Fight
Freedom Foundation
Opt Out Today
Freedom Foundation

Contact Info

Lawsuit Over 2015 Freedom Foundation Information Request Finally Reaches State Supreme Court

Labor Litigation Washington
  • Eric Stahlfeld
  • May 15, 2019

Freedom Foundation Litigation Counsel Sydney Phillips on Tuesday explained to the Washington State Supreme Court that a 2016 ruling issued against the organization by a lower court and subsequently upheld on appeal would make a shambles of the state’s public information laws.

The case deals with a 2015 records request filed by the Freedom Foundation for documents from four University of Washington employees. Specifically, the request sought e-mails mentioning or including the terms “Freedom Foundation,” the U.S. Supreme Court case Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, and certain unions.

The request also sought e-mails sent from, or to, a UW e-mail address, aaup@u.washington.edu.

UW officials agreed the nearly 4,000 pages of documents were a matter of public record and were inclined to release them. The action was opposed, however, by SEIU 925 — which wasn’t even recognized as the bargaining representative of these four employees.

The union sought, however, to prevent disclosure of public records involving one, Robert Wood, who was unhappy about how UW was treating him and other employees and had become involved with 925’s (ultimately unsuccessful) efforts to unionize the university faculty.

Wood also was the UW representative to the American Association of University Professors, a national organization devoted to standards for higher education and promoting working conditions for those engaged in teaching and research.

SEIU 925 obtained a trial court order these documents should not be disclosed, prompting the Freedom Foundation’s appeal.

The Court of Appeals, Division 1, upheld the lower court ruling, applying a novel interpretation to the statutory definition of what constitutes a public record.

Under Washington law, a document “owned, used, or retained” by a state agency and containing information “relating to the conduct of government” is considered public record. Further, the Washington State Supreme Court in Nissen v. Pierce County held that even documents on an employee’s private electronic device were “owned, used, or retained” by the state agency – and thus a public record – so long as the document was within the “scope of employment” of the government employee.

Otherwise, many public employees would succumb to the temptation to avoid public scrutiny simply by using their private devices to conduct government business.

The appellate court judge applied this “scope of employment” test to the other part of the definition of a public record, whether the document “relates to the conduct of government.” If Prof. Wood’s e-mail, created on and using the UW system, he ruled, could not be released even if it mentioned the union or the Freedom Foundation, or if the document related to the conduct of government, because this was not considered within the “scope of his employment” as an Atmospheric Sciences professor.

Because this could gut the Public Records Act, the Freedom Foundation again appealed, this time to the Washington State Supreme Court.

During Tuesday’s hearing, held in Port Angeles, Justice Debra Stephens addressed the public policy issue when she observed that, had any professor sent a sexually harassing e-mail to a colleague, that would be outside the scope of his employment and not disclosable, even though it certainly related to the conduct of government, meeting the statute’s definition.

As a matter of public concern, the public should be able to see harassing e-mails.  As a legal matter, the Court of Appeals’ opinion changed the words in the statute, which simply is wrong.

  • SEIU 925 UW Washington Supreme Court

Recent Blogs

Freedom Foundation has something bruin at UCLA
May 18, 2022
General Assembly extends collective bargaining to Colorado counties
May 18, 2022
$200 million back into the pockets of hard-working Americans
May 10, 2022
Foundation comments on anti-Janus legislation in California
May 6, 2022
Colorado WINS expects to keep its members in line with lies
May 6, 2022

Press Articles

  • Jan 31 — The Federalist — The Federalist – Report: Washington Is Inflating COVID Death Tolls, Even After Getting Caught Once Before

    Read The Article

  • Dec 18 — Ricochet — Ricochet – You Can’t Handle the Truth, or Numbers

    Read The Article

  • Dec 18 — Fox News Radio — More evidence states inflating numbers of COVID deaths

    Read The Article

  • Dec 01 — KFLD News Talk — Investigation Shows WSDOH Still ‘Inflating’ COVID Death Counts

    Read The Article

  • General Inquiries

    Info@FreedomFoundation.com

    Media Inquiries

    avarner@freedomfoundation.com

    Follow Us

             

    Contact Locations

    Washington:

    360-956-3482
    P.O. Box 552 Olympia,
    WA 98507

    Pennsylvania:

    484-747-6072
    P.O. Box 1069 Kennett Square,
    PA 19348

    California:

    949-954-8914
    1442 E Lincoln Ave #440 Orange,
    CA 92865

    Oregon:

    503-951-6208
    P.O. Box 18146 Salem,
    OR 97305

    Ohio:

    380-207-3901
    P.O. Box 14210 Cincinnati,
    OH 45250

    © 2021 Freedom Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
    Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 94-3136961